TRANSPORTATION FUNDING LEGISLATION
ADVANCES
In a move designed to prevent a floor fight over
technical issues, the Senate "recommitted" SB
1379 back to the Senate Finance Committee, insuring
its failure. SB 1379 (See
VTCA General Assembly Update 2-2-07) was the Senate
Finance Committee's alternative proposal to the
"compromise legislation" (HB
3202 and SB
1417) offered by the Republican Leadership in the
House, and would have removed the sales tax exemption
for gasoline, raising more than $500 million a year for
transportation.
HB 3202 (See
VTCA General Assembly Update 1-22-07) did pass the
House by a vote of 61-37 with some minor amendments. (See
Vote Breakdown).
HB 3202 includes a $10 increase in passenger vehicle
registration fees, an increase in the registration fee
for trucks, raising the tax on diesel fuel to that of
gasoline, the use of up to $2 billion in debt to fund
construction projects, and an increase in fines for
serious traffic violations and fees for drivers with bad
records. It also commits the tax on insurance premiums
to pay down existing VDOT debt, and it dedicates half of
any future surplus to transportation spending. In
addition, HB 3202 allows Hampton Roads and Northern
Virginia to increase fees and taxes to provide more than
$400 million annually for those regions.
The House and Senate votes keep transportation
funding "in play" for this legislative
session. HB 3202 now advances to the Senate, where its
counterpart failed, and is likely to receive a series of
amendments.
The Governor commented late last night that:
"The House passage of this bill is a further
indication that there are significant areas of consensus
as we continue to consider solutions to our serious
transportation funding challenges. The transportation
challenges are statewide. They are especially acute in
the Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads regions. A
solution will require substantial additional revenues.
And the discussion also must include reforms that
promote accountability and strengthen the link between
transportation and land use.
I continue to have concerns about some elements of
this proposal, and we will continue to work closely with
the leaders in the House and the Senate to address those
concerns as this proposal moves through the legislative
process. I am encouraged that significant changes
already have improved this legislation since it was
first announced by the legislative leadership.
This vote was an important step, and much hard
work remains. There is ample time to craft a plan that
moves Virginia forward before this session is scheduled
to adjourn." |